From dirty to waste-free elections
Posted by: Alecks P. Pabico | February 9, 2007 at 12:34 am
Filed under: 2007 Elections, Environment Watch
MANY regard the 2004 presidential elections as the dirtiest in Philippine electoral history, surpassing the record set during the 1969 polls which saw the incumbent Ferdinand Marcos sparing no expense to get himself reelected.
But while cheating is par for the course in every electoral exercise that this country has known since gaining independence, Philippine elections have always been dirty — well, literally, that is.
For every election has brought with it an avalanche of trash. No, these are not the discards generated by voting the wrong people to public office (though they do fit the category). These are rubbish left in the campaign trail of candidates from the national to the local down to the barangay level fighting for elective posts in government — posters, leaflets, streamers, banners, pamphlets, sample ballots, stickers, calendars, pins, buttons, flags, and other printed materials.
![Campaign posters litter the streets of Manila. [photo by Christopher Scott] Campaign posters litter the streets of Manila. [photo by Christopher Scott]](http://www.pcij.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/campaign-posters2.jpg)
And where once the production of candidates’ campaign materials was the sole domain of those wealthy enough to own printing presses, today’s accessible digital printing technology has also vastly improved almost everybody’s capacity for churning out even more garbage come election campaign time.
Anticipating the deluge of campaign trash in this year’s elections that they say will most likely end up in dump sites all over the country, healthy environment campaigners have decided to launch a crusade for waste-free elections to avert the messy situation.
Understandably, EcoWaste Coalition is knocking at the door of the Commission on Elections (Comelec), whom the environmentalists want to take proactive measures to check and curb waste in campaign operations and activities.
At 9:30 this morning, EcoWaste’s volunteers from various groups and communities will gather outside the office of the poll body in Intramuros, Manila to present to Commissioner Rene Sarmiento a set of guidelines for use by the Comelec, political parties and candidates to prevent and reduce campaign waste.
The group says it will dispatch waste-free elections patrols during the campaign period to persuade political parties and aspiring public servants to use resources judiciously and stick to earth-friendly campaign practices. It will also keep tabs on “dirty” candidates that hurt trees and spoil the surroundings with campaign trash.
“We urge all well-meaning candidates to put waste avoidance and reduction at the heart of their strategy to win, so as to minimize the health, environmental and financial costs of unwarranted campaign trash,” EcoWaste said in a statement.
Waste-free elections, according to the coalition, will diminish the wasteful consumption of paper and other valuable resources and minimize the release of toxic contaminants such as greenhouse gases, persistent organic pollutants and heavy metals into our communities and into our air, water and food supplies.
To conserve trees and protect our forests, watersheds, and ecosystems, it suggests the use of post-consumer recycled paper for campaign materials.
Data obtained by the group show that each ton of recycled paper can save 17 trees, 380 gallons of oil, and 7,000 gallons of water. On the other hand, uncoated virgin printing and office paper consume 24 trees.
The coalition also advises candidates to shun campaign materials that are hardly reused or recycled as confetti, buntings and balloons, and also to avoid environmentally problematic ones like tarpaulin, Styrofoam and other plastics because of difficulties with disposing them.
EcoWaste’s campaign has the support of Gaudencio Cardinal Rosales of the Archdiocese of Manila who early this week urged the Comelec and Filipinos from all of walks of life to team up to ensure a clean election that is free from fraud and waste.
“Sa kandidatong may malasakit sa kalikasan, may pag-asa ang bayan,” said Rosales.
“As stewards of His creation, I urge all the faithful, especially the political parties and all those running for public office, to pay careful attention to the health and environmental effects of all campaign materials and events to ensure that nothing is wasted.”
Organizations behind the EcoWaste initiative include Buklod Tao Foundation, Cavite Green Coalition, Concerned Citizens Against Pollution, Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives, Greenpeace Southeast Asia, Health Care Without Harm, Mother Earth Foundation, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines - National Secretariat for Social Action, Justice and Peace, November 17 Movement, Sanib Lakas ng Inang Kalikasan, and Zero Waste Philippines.
Below are EcoWaste’s 10-Point Guidelines for Political Parties and Candidates to Prevent and Reduce Campaign Waste:
1. Designate a lead team in the campaign structure that will be tasked to prevent or reduce campaign waste to zero or near-zero in all campaign activities.
2. Target zero tolerance on garbage in all campaign meetings, sorties and related activities.
- Keep the campaign litter-free.
- Shun throwing confetti, exploding firecrackers or releasing balloons in campaign events.
- Refrain from using Styrofoam, plastic bags and other single-use containers for volunteers’ meals and drinks.
- Set up segregated waste bins for biodegradable and non-biodegradable discards in campaign assemblies.
- Designate “eco-volunteers” to look after the bins and guide the public in the proper separation of their discards.
- Clean up right after the campaign event.
- Hire a local waste picker to pick up segregated wastes from campaign venue for recycling/ composting.
3. Refrain from using excessive campaign materials such as leaflets, pamphlets, posters, stickers, decals, streamers and other campaign paraphernalia.
4. For election propaganda materials: to include a friendly reminder that says “Para sa ating kalusugan at kalikasan, huwag pong ikalat, itambak o sunugin” or its equivalent in local languages.
5. Avoid the use of specific campaign materials such as tarpaulin and other plastics as their disposal has been environmentally problematic.
6. Use post-consumer recycled paper for campaign materials to conserve trees and protect our forests, watersheds, and ecosystems. To make recycling easy, avoid using plastic-coated paper.
7. Stay away from campaign materials that are hardly reused or recycled such as confetti, buntings and balloons. These are often burned or discarded in storm drains, esteros, rivers, seas and dumps.
8. Reject grafitti or vandalism, or the willful or malicious defacing or destruction of property.
9. Harm not the trees: spare the trees of election campaign materials. Use designated common poster areas.
10. Win or lose — remove election campaign materials from all sites immediately after the election day on May 14, 2007.
feel free to leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.













2 people have left comments
Thanks for your thoughtful comments Floyd. I guess the impt point is something you already touched on, that all it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing.
Then there is this thought: all the surveys point to the Opposition taking over the Senate and ushering in a “Hanging Senate” where there will be at least 16 members ready to convict the President at impeachment. It’s much harder to cheat the Senate vote, and even harder because of what happened in 2004.
But the point of this post is that it is unprincipled to boycott an election just because we don’t think we will like the result.
Democracy is about freedom and opportunity, not a guarantee of results.
-Rizalist-
This comment came after I posted my comment in Dean Jorge Bocobo’s blog suffice to say he pointed out some details he thought i missed upon.
I agree with all that he wrote but i beg to differ accordingly to his arguments.
*all it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing - Now by saying this his argument became very tricky. Does he mean that by participating in a “fraud” election we become the good people doing something for evil not to triumph? Or does he mean that even before a “fraud election” becomes manifest we will be able to clean it up and make it more credible, thus making us good people? To expound further doesn’t it merit that calling the Comelec a “Commission riddled with fraud” as exampled in the last elections make my arguments valid? Perhaps the difference lies in his approach as to how he defines evil. Perhaps voting and practicing the right to vote is not evil per se but the process of how our votes are counted and made accountable is what becomes evil in the end. Other than that does he mean that by doing nothing–which is boycotting the elections, we would help this illegitimate government make an election under its regime legitimate?
*Then there is this thought: all the surveys point to the Opposition taking over the Senate and ushering in a “Hanging Senate” where there will be at least 16 members ready to convict the President at impeachment. It’s much harder to cheat the Senate vote, and even harder because of what happened in 2004. - I have yet to understand a survey in the Philippines that presents the desired results as produced by the study. Lest we forget in the 2004 elections it was FPJ who was leading the surveys and yet GMA was the one who won it. Surveys as in the case of the Philippines are either used to complement a candidate or show the truth in society. But surveys can never read ballots and award a candidate its seat in government, especially when the ones counting it are the ones who counted GMA’s in congress.
*But the point of this post is that it is unprincipled to boycott an election just because we don’t think we will like the result - Let me ask you a question why do you think we ever vote? Isn’t it because we believe that our votes will be counted? That our names registered in Comelec will be found in the right precincts and ballots? That the candidate we choose will win an election? When does it become unprincipled to choose to go against a system that doesn’t safeguard these rights? When does it become unprincipled to believe and think that before we ever get to vote we must clean our Comelec and put to justice our president?
*Democracy is about freedom and opportunity, not a guarantee of results - Now there was a saying that behind every right there exists a duty. In a democracy indeed we have a right to our freedom and free opportunities yet we should protect it so we will find the results it guarantees. I don’t know what he means by saying that Democracy being not a guarantee of results. Is he saying that just because we are able to practice our freedom to vote and our opportunity to choose our leaders we are to be equally happy even if we know for a fact that the ones handling our democracy (which is our government and Comelec) are those who manipulates them for their own ends?
I hope that this would shed light further to what I am trying to touch upon.
[...] candidates really need to be educated on how adding to the country’s garbage problem isn’t really the best way to start a career in [...]