Trial and error in the May polls
Posted by: PCIJ | May 12, 2010 at 5:57 pm
Filed under: 2010 Elections
by Alexandra Francisco, JC Cordon, and AR Sabangan
The automation of the May polls had better results than expected. Still, many election officials and voters could perhaps be likened to mangoes that were prematurely ripened with the use of kalburo (calcium carbide), or teenage parents who were left with no choice but to mature overnight.
It was, to use a popular phrase, a case of hinog sa pilit (being forcibly ripened).
Forced to adopt to a modern system of voting amid old and worn-out facilities, inadequate information, training, and technical know-how, election inspectors in the cities of Navotas and Malabon had to resort to trial and error to make the precinct count optical scan (PCOS) voting machines work.
“Kulang ang dalawang araw na training nung March. Kailangang mag-adjust kami. May mga election procedures na di kasama sa training tulad ng transmission of votes. Natakot kami na baka pumalpak,” said Eliseo Estrada, a chairman of the Board of Election Inspectors at Navotas City’s North Bay Boulevard South (NBBS) Elementary School, which had 13,000 registered voters.
Unfortunately, the lack of training for the BEIs was not the only problem. Even the information technology (IT) experts who were supposed to guide the BEIs along did not seem to know what they were doing.
On Sunday, May 9, the teachers could not make the PCOS machines work during their first and final testing on the eve of the elections. It turned out that the BEIs did not know what compact flash (CF) card to insert into the PCOS. Neither did the assigned IT expert.
There were further delays in the testing because the technician did not see the errors in the way the BEI connected the PCOS machines to the power supply. The machine should be connected to either an outlet or the battery provided by Smartmatic—not both.
At the Ninoy Aquino Elementary School (NAES) in Longos, Malabon, unfamiliarity with the automated device was also the problem encountered by both the teachers and the technician.
“Hindi gamay ng BEI ‘yung paggamit ng machine kaya nahirapan sa testing,” said John Lester Santos, the IT expert assigned at the NAES.
But the NAES teachers swore it wasn’t only them who lacked knowledge on how to operate the machines.
“Eh di rin siya masyadong nakatulong. Kami-kami lang ang naka-troubleshoot ng problema. Nag-trial and error kami,” said a NAES teacher who claimed that the technician didn’t know what to do either. Often, they find him sending text messages to his supervisor about the complaints and questions of the BEIs.
The school’s shaky power supply was another concern for Estrada. Up until Saturday, May 8, the school was busy fixing the electrical wiring because most of the classrooms lacked circuit breakers for additional power outlets. Estrada feared that if all 13 PCOS machines assigned to the school were plugged into the same circuit, the school would catch fire from an electrical overload.
In fact, since Estrada started teaching at the NBBS in 1982, the school had already caught fire several times. Estrada said many outlets were busted or corroded due to flooding. One classroom simply had no electricity at all.
“Kung tutuusin matagal nang sinabi ni principal (sa munisipyo) na ipaayos yung wiring pero dumating lang ‘yung mga nagre-repair kahapon (Sabado). Kung hindi dumating ang eleksyon, siguro di pa maayos ang kuryente,” Estrada said.
Not all the problems had to do with the BEIs or the PCOS machines, though.
Curiously, despite the deluge of information and commercials on how to shade the ovals, some voters still couldn’t get it right.
Apparently, some voters listened too hard to the instruction of the Sexbomb Dancers: “Ang kailangan sa bilog ay simpleng-simple lang, itiman, i-shade ang loob ng bilog.”
One voter complained that no one told him not to press too hard with his pen.
“Wala naman kasing nagsabi sa ‘kin na huwag diinan. Ang sabi lang huwag lalagpas. Nakakapanghinayang… nabale-wala boto ko,” said 24-year-old Napeleon de Gracia, a first-time voter, whose ballot was rejected after he overmarked the ovals.
Still, many voters went beyond the eight-minute limit in shading their ballots, not because they deliberately wanted to delay the polls, but because, despite three months of incessant wooing by candidates, they were still undecided on election day.
“Sinubukan kong kumpletuhin yung dose, pero hindi pa rin nabuo. Hindi ko kasi kilala yung mga tumatakbong senador,” said a 25-year-old male voter at the NBBS who took 15 minutes and 25 seconds to finish shading the ballot.
“Nabubulok na ‘yung isa dun,” observed a poll watcher from Parish Pastoral Council for Responsible Voting, referring to a female voter at NBBS’s Cluster 128. The voter spent more than 20 minutes to finish shading her ballot.
“Wala kasi akong listahan, tsaka di ko kilala yung mga senador. Walo lang naiboto ko,” said another female voter, 23, who took more than 18 minutes to finish shading her ballot.
The Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism monitored the time it took people to vote at the NBBS. On the average, it took them 11 minutes to shade and another two minutes to fall in line and wait for their turn to feed the ballot.
The feeding took longer than expected because there were instances when the machines only accepted the ballots after four trials.
Minutes before the polls closed, BEIs in the NBBS tallied at least 66 rejected ballots. Most reasons for rejections ranged from the understandable to the bizarre.
Most BEI chairmen encountered ovals that were so heavily shaded with marking pens that the ink penetrated up to the back of the ballot. These were rejected by the PCOS machines.
Other voters were simply careless in the way they shaded their ovals, accidently making stray marks on their ballots.
One voter, accoding to a BEI chairman, shaded not the oval but the number beside it. And perhaps a tragic case was that of a woman in her 60s who wrote the name of her candidate at the back of the ballot. Maybe the last election was still vivid in her mind.
Meanwhile, 52-year-old Nelly Legaspi had to be assisted by a companion because she had poor eyesight. While voting, she complained that she couldn’t see the small print: “Masakit sa mata.”
“Wala akong salamin eh, wala kasi akong pambili. Wala akong trabaho. Yung asawa ko nagsa-sideline sa pedicab pero lasenggo. Yung apat kong anak wala ring trabaho,” said Legaspi. - PCIJ, 2010
feel free to leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.













1 person has left a comment
[...] the in-depth article on the schools we covered for this year’s elections, visit http://www.pcij.org/blog/?p=5448 and [...]