Congress abolishes death penalty
Posted by: Vinia Datinguinoo | June 7, 2006 at 10:26 am
Filed under: Congress Watch, In the News
THE Senate and House of Representatives yesterday voted to abolish the death penalty.
Saying capital punishment “contradicts the importance of human life,” the Senate, voting 16-0 with one abstention, approved Senate Bill No. 2254 prohibiting the imposition of death penalty.
The House of Representatives, also yesterday, passed its own version of the measure; 119 voted to pass House Bill No. 4826, and 20 were against.
The measures will cause the repeal of Republic Act No. 7659 or the Death Penalty Law, as well as RA 8177, which prescribes death by lethal injection for those convicted of heinous crimes.
Instead of death, the penalty is downgraded to reclusion perpetua, or life imprisonment. (A person sentenced with reclusion perpetua becomes eligible for parole after 30 years.)
The two chambers will sit in a bicameral conference to consolidate a final version, which will be passed on to the President for signing. Mrs. Arroyo had publicly said she was in favor of the abolition of capital punishment, and in April commuted the death sentences of some 1,200 prisoners, to life imprisonment.
That presidential move drew mixed reactions, with human-rights groups and Catholic church leaders welcoming the commutation, and anti-crime organizations criticizing what they said was the government’s “insensitivity” to victims of heinous crimes.
Archbishop Angel Lagdameo, for instance, speaking for the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines which he heads, at that time said that the “growing aversion of public opinion” against death penalty, “constitutes visible manifestation of a heightened moral consciousness.”
Human-rights advocates have long said that capital punishment discriminates against the poor and powerless, and does not deter crime.
But anti-crime groups, who insist that the abolition of capital punishment would encourage criminals, have quickly denounced the passage of the congressional measures.
“Why weaken the law?” said Dante Jimenez, founding chair of the Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption. “If you weaken the law you strengthen the criminals.” Jimenez said the congressional measures were “railroaded,” and that their groups were not invited by Congress to the discussions about the proposal.
View S.B. 2254 here, and H.B. 4826 here.
This a timeline of capital punishment in the Philippines, from the Mamamayang Tutol sa Bitay-Movement for Restorative Justice.
feel free to leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.













10 people have left comments
GREAT, I GUESS THE MOTHER F-ing MARCOSES ARE OFF THE HOOK. This is very disappointing. Filipinos, stop being stupid and rise up.
You expect too much Rye, they could not even nail down any of the Marcoses…neither their cronies, even for tax evasion. A classic case of double standard in the justice system. It is in situation like this that the deadly Sparrow Unit of the NPAs comes handy.
It’s high time that we repealed the death penalty. Now the next part is changing the penal system so that the focus is on rehabilitation of convicts to enable them to reenter society and move away from focusing solely on retribution and punishment.
This culture of death must end! Following the much appreciated decision of the Supreme Court’s denial of Presidential Proclamation 1017, declaring a state of national emergency in February and the so-called “Calibrated Pre-empted Response”, I welcome this another enlightened decision of the Supreme Court.
Nobody has the right to take another man’s right - even the state. Only the Creator has. The right to life is absolute and it is God-given. Abortion, euthanasia, suicide, even killing of fetuses for stem cell research is objectively and intrinsically evil!
By abolishing death penalty in our country we could begin a milestone of affirming the culture of life. This is a good start for change, first of all: a shift of our cultural mentalities which has gone wild to the point of killings, kidnappings, rape, etc.
I do appreciate very much this new and fresh wind of mentality from the Supreme Court. May these good men and women flower and bloom in this country which seem to become a valley of tears, if not a land soaked with blood.
[...] This culture of death must end! Following the much appreciated decision of the Supreme Court’s denial of Presidential Proclamation 1017, declaring a state of national emergency in February and the so-called “Calibrated Pre-empted Response”, I welcome this another enlightened decision of the Supreme Court. [...]
[...] The day after, there is victory over death. [...]
the death penalty law today
will it be lina law tomorrow?
wait till we see the day –
the ending of landowner’s sorrow.
(shucks! i almost forgot…)
congress will always think 2x to repeal or revise
squatting which the stupid law promotes.
for although it made the informal settlers wise,
trapos always know, it still won them their votes.
(election time a-coming?…drat!)
[...] Still, there have been instances when it was not able to do so. MTB-MRJ cites a study by Dawson and Gregory (2004) which documents the case of a 79-year-old man wrongfully sentenced to death (Republic Act No. 7659, recently repealed by Congress, prohibits the meting of the death penalty on those below 18 and above 70 years old). Unfortunately, the man died on death row before the SC could review his case, five years after sentencing. [...]
[...] Anti-crime groups like the Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption are indignant. They say that the decision of the President and of Congress, which voted to repeal the death penalty law on June 7, was made out of “political convenience.” [...]
[...] Bayan Muna, Gabriela, and Anakpawis partlist representatives co-authored HB 03421, an act repealing the death penalty, which was later substituted by HB04826. Congress later voted to abolish the death penalty. [...]