Full automation of electoral system in place by 2010?
Posted by: Alecks P. Pabico | June 9, 2006 at 5:21 pm
Filed under: Comelec Watch, Congress Watch
FULL automation of the country’s electoral system by 2010 is anticipated with the approval of the House of Representatives on third and final reading of a bill amending the election automation law (Republic Act No. 8436) two days before Congress adjourned its second regular session.
With congressmen voting overwhelmingly in its favor, 163-2 (with one abstention), House Bill No. 5352 has been hailed to remedy the “excessively technology-specific” provisions of RA 8436 that Rep. Teodoro Locsin Jr., chairman of the sponsoring Committee on Suffrage and Electoral Reforms, says have “rendered the Commission on Elections (Comelec) inutile to implement the law effectively and without controversy.”
With HB 5352’s passage, the House now awaits the approval of the bill’s counterpart in the Senate, which was only able to conclude interpellations on Senate Bill No. 2231 before it adjourned sessions yesterday. The Senate bill provides for the adoption of an Automated Election System (AES) to modernize the electoral process based on the most appropriate and cost-effective technology to be recommended by an advisory council.
While RA 8436, enacted in 1997, authorized the Comelec to use an automated election system as early as the 1998 elections for the voting and canvassing of votes, the law has to this day not been fully implemented.
The Comelec is partly to blame for this, as the poll body is accused of bungling its election modernization program, wasting P2.3 billion in the process, including P1 billion already paid to a Korean firm-led consortium to purchase automated counting machines for the May 2004 elections.
The P1.3-billion contract with Mega Pacific e-Solutions, was invalidated by the Supreme Court in January 2004 because of glaring irregularities that attended the bidding process. The Court declared the Comelec and its concerned officials were culpable of grave abuse of discretion in awarding the contract to an unqualified bidder (Mega Pacific e-Solutions) which was incorporated 11 days before the submission of bids; changing the bid specifications in the middle of the evaluation; and awarding the contract prior to the report of the bids and awards committee.
The bids committee was also found to have arbitrarily prescribed eligibility requirements that favored a particular bidder, Mega Pacific Consortium.
But electoral reform advocates and information technology professionals led by the Information Technology Foundation of the Philippines (ITFP) have also questioned the machine specifications provided in the law which, they say, seems to favor a particular technology — in this case, the optical mark sense system involving an automated vote-counting machine that scans paper ballots with its built-in optical mark reader.
In response to this criticism, Locsin says the amendatory HB 5352 now provides for minimum capabilities that effectively amends Section 7 of RA 8436 enumerating the features of the automation system. Under Section 4 of the bill, the new parameters have been defined as follows:
- adequate security against unauthorized access;
- accuracy in recording and reading of votes as well as tabulation, consolidation/canvassing and transmission of results;
- error recovery in case of non-catastrophic failure of device;
- system integrity, to ensure physical stability and functioning of the vote recording and counting process;
- provision for voter-verified paper audit trail;
- system audit ability, which provides supporting documentation for verifying the correctness of reported election results;
- an election management system for preparing ballots and programs for use in the casting and counting of votes and to consolidate, report and display election results in the shortest possible time;
- accessibility to illiterates and other disabled voters;
- vote tabulating program for election, referendum or plebiscites;
- accurate ballot counters; and
- data retention.
Augusto Lagman, technology chief of the National Citizens’ Movement for Free Elections (Namfrel), welcomes this development as the bill has addressed their concern to make the election automation law technology-neutral. “This is consistent with what we’ve been advocating for because it can allow the use of new technologies that become available,” he says.
Akbayan party-list Rep. Loretta Ann Rosales, an electoral reform advocate, agrees, citing the fact that the bill contains four important amendments on the issue of election automation.
More than removing the tailor-fit specifications, though, the bill, she said, also now proposes the use of appropriate technology in all four phases of the elections — from voting, counting, canvassing to the electronic transmission of election results.
Rosales also lauds the proposal to have the automation implemented on a stagerred basis for next year’s mid-term elections, beginning with the National Capital Region, Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao, and at least three other regions to be designated by the Comelec.
In case the Comelec fails to implement the automation, a default provision provides for reverting to the manual mode of elections.
One other significant amendment introduced in the bill, Rosales adds, addresses the issue of horsetrading. Under HB 5352, substitution of candidates will only be allowed in case of death or permanent disability. This removes withdrawal and disqualificiation among the causes for candidate substitution in the Omnibus Election Code.
Download HB 5352 here.
feel free to leave a comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.













4 people have left comments
Useless HB because of ‘inutile’ Senate…sabi nga ni Serge digital camera na lang daw to take photos of election return hrrrr, hrrrr, hrrrrr
[...] WHILE acknowledging that automation has a role to play in modernizing our elections, which remains a pitiful throwback from the first-ever held local polls in Bulacan more than a century ago, local information technology pioneer Roberto Verzola thinks the real problem does not lie with having an antiquated electoral system but with the fact that the cheats don’t get punished at all. [...]
On electoral reforms,
“The Comelec is partly to blame for this, as the poll body is accused of bungling its election modernization program, wasting P2.3 billion … ”
Since Abalos will not resign, Congress must pass an ammendment that would
1) abolish the present COMELEC and form a new body,
2) change the process of the appointments to the commission
3) remove from the COMELEC jurisdiction hearings on election protests,
Reform and automation undertaken by present COMELEC is hopelessly not credible. Forming a new Commission is proirity.
[...] The system of election here in the Philippines is still outdated. We still have to write down each of the candidates name. I guess we will be expecting the full automation of the electoral system in 2010 according to PCIJ’s report. [...]