ISSUE NO. 4
NOVEMBER 2005
Get the latest issue of i REPORT with a special feature on Pinoy political humor. Featured Stories
PEOPLE POWER ELECTIONS 2004 10 Reasons to Doubt the 2004 Election Results THE FUTURE OF ELECTIONS REFORMS IN THE BARRACKS JOURNALIST AT RISK THE METROPOLIS WOMEN AND DISASTER YOUTH VOLUNTEERS SPECIAL ON PINOY POLITICAL HUMOR La Vida Doble Mobile Clowning Where Has All the Laughter Gone? Kick Out the Clowns |
THE PARADOX OF FREEDOM![]() When public space migrates to the airwaves and the news pages, politics risks degenerating into a spectator sport.
Media coverage is likewise unprecedented. Twenty-four-hour news and live broadcasts have taken every whistleblower's account (and private intrigues) to living rooms and offices everywhere. Anti-Arroyo blogging, until recently a fringe activity for political junkies with too much time on their hands, has now exploded into the mainstream. So have ring tones, jokes, and gossip circulating via text. Like a virus contaminating everything from online chat rooms, office conversations, news broadcasts, showbiz talk shows, and text messages, there is no escaping "Gloriagate." The damage to the president, as independent polling figures indicate, seems irreversible. If People Power had a script, then this would be it. Pundits predicted it was just going to be a matter of time before Edsa 4 erupted. All that was left was for people to spill out into the streets. Many did, but not in numbers that sent previous presidents packing. In the week that followed Cory Aquino's surprise televised appeal for President Arroyo to resign, about 30,000 to 40,000 protesters converged on Makati's Ayala Avenue-the best effort so far since the crisis erupted. Organizers promised more, but the rallies on the days leading up to and immediately after the impeachment complaint was killed in Congress failed to meet expectations. Where was People Power, or at least the kind that showed up in past Edsa uprisings? That's what the opposition, the administration, and the media, who had already laid out its coverage plans for a fourth Edsa, were left asking. There was and continues to be no shortage of answers. Organizers within the anti-Arroyo opposition blame it on the lack of centralized leadership — and on mutual distrust. With a coalition as diverse in its representation as in its alternatives to President Arroyo, observers predicted that divisions within the movement would begin to affect the ability to communicate a coherent message and project a credible image to the public. From the onset, the presence of personalities affiliated with Ferdinand Marcos and Joseph Estrada in the coalition, both of whom were ousted by previous Edsa uprisings, created discomfort among People Power veterans. Those who had experienced the various Edsa uprisings, if only vicariously through news coverage, were just as perplexed — even outraged — by the odd coalition of former-enemies-now-bedfellows in the campaign to oust GMA. There were attempts to correct this public-relations confusion by giving the anti-Arroyo movement a more prominent middle-class, or put more accurately, a friendlier "middle-force" character. But repackaging the coalition proved difficult. In the age of information, hardly anything can still be concealed from the public. Whatever the camera lens cannot expose is left over for the commentariat to scrutinize. Few secrets survive when the media's attention is on overdrive. Previous Edsa revolts may have shared the same organizational limitations. But the lack of a central command, and a more defined, and therefore sustainable, organizational structure was less of a problem then since the uprisings unfolded so quickly. Ousting a president, unlike transforming society, requires less preparation. Organizational unity and ideological purity are not as critical-unless when waging protracted warfare. Nevertheless, the failure of organization remains a popular explanation for the absence of People Power in 2005. It is, however, far from being the only reason. Neither is it the most compelling. POLITICS OF SCANDAL
Not that the public isn't outraged by the allegations of presidential malfeasance; only that they may have, after a previous term marked by investigations on her husband, already conditioned themselves to expect more scandals ahead. No coincidence perhaps that Arroyo anchored her election campaign on the less-than-inspiring themes of pragmatism and continuity. Notably, though, Raul Roco, Eddie Villanueva, Panfilo Lacson and Fernando Poe, Jr. promised to bring moral leadership to Malacañang as a way to differentiate themselves from the incumbent. Presidential allies like to argue that the oust-Arroyo campaign is only round two of last year's elections. That may be a shallow and self-serving analogy, but a quick look at the warm bodies occupying the street protests shows a who's who of political partisans who campaigned for the president's opponents. And like last year's elections, the administration is once again selling to its core constituency the continuity of an Arroyo presidency over the risky alternative of a transition government or military-civilian junta. Fear of the unknown might be keeping People Power locked safely at home, but so too is fatigue. You hear it all the time on radio and television call-in programs: people are tired of politics. Not too tired to watch their politicians outdo the soaps on television, mind you, but too overwhelmed nonetheless by the political mudslinging that threatens to get anyone involved dirtied in the process. In this political free-for-all, take-no-prisoners brawl, no one is spared. Not the pious Cory, or the ever so proper Susan. Not even the Catholic bishops have managed to escape the public's skepticism. Retired generals, civil-society leaders, even B-list actors-everyone is considered a plotter or a has-been mounting a comeback. Distrust for public figures has reached alarming levels so much that people now find it hard to make out the crusaders from the carpetbaggers, the journalists from the spin doctors, the well-meaning from the just plain mean. When the citizens' trust in institutions, in leaders, and ultimately in themselves erodes, a climate of political nihilism takes over and people begin to withdraw from civic life and give up on political action altogether. This is the end of innocence — the rude awakening to a world the way politicians see it: a politics without the illusions of greatness and heroics. It is shades of grey all over and murky definitions of the public good. This is the moral relativism abhorred by both idealists and conservatives everywhere. But after a history of revolutions with disappointing results, Filipinos have learned to adjust and adapt.
Email us your comments about this article, or post them in our blog.
|