24 APRIL 2008
SEE ALSO
RELEVANT DOCUMENTS
RELEVANT LINKS
PREVIOUS REPORTS
|
A FONDNESS FOR EX-SOLDIERS?
To be sure, UP political science professor Clarita Carlos says all presidents before Arroyo had sent many ex-soldiers to retirement haven in civilian service posts. During the Aquino administration, at least 15 retired officers were appointed to key civilian posts in the DND, Malacañang, Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA), and other agencies. Ex-soldiers had a field day during the Ramos government, which rewarded at least 100 retired and active duty military officers with government positions and board seats formerly held by civilians, according to journalist Glenda Gloria in her book We Were Soldiers. Fifty-two of them were appointed to the DND, Malacañang, DFA, and other agencies. The number of military appointees went down to 28 during the Estrada administration, including 18 named to key positions. By all indications, Arroyo takes after Fidel V. Ramos, a retired soldier himself, when it comes to allowing ex-uniformed men a revolving door in civilian service. By 2002, Arroyo had named at least 51 retired and active-duty military officers to civilian posts, according to Gloria. The CSC, meanwhile, has compiled a partial list of at least 48 retired military officers in the Arroyo government. David notes though that more than 90 ex-soldiers and ex-policemen hold key positions today in the bureaucracy. One ex-soldier also stands out for having a series of four Cabinet portfolio appointments: Angelo Reyes, the Armed Forces chief of staff in January 2001 who led the generals' mass defection to the Arroyo side during the second EDSA people power revolt.
FOUR CABINET PORTFOLIO
A career service officer who saw Reyes's work at the DENR laments the invasion of the bureaucracy by political appointees. “You look at that as a continuing downward [spiral],” says the officer. “You're demoralized, then disgruntled, then callous, then passive. You're dead.” David, the CSC's chairperson for seven years until last February, calls the situation as “the politicization of the bureaucracy.” How it unravels, she says, is simple enough to understand. Explains David: “When you know as a career person that your future is dependent upon a political act, and not on the constitutionally-prescribed merit and fitness... then your tendency is to be timid, to say yes, not to step on anybody's toes. That makes you ineffective.”
Email us your comments about this article, or post them in our blog. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||